Your rights
Reasonable accommodation at work: how to ask, examples, and what to do if you're denied
Short answer
A reasonable accommodation is a change to your job, schedule, equipment or workplace rules that lets you work with a disability, a pregnancy-related limitation or a religious practice. Ask in plain words, best in writing. Employers with 15 or more employees must agree unless it causes undue hardship. If refused, an EEOC charge is due within 180 or 300 days.
Letter generator · 11 laws
Write your reasonable accommodation request letter
Built from the EEOC's guidance and each state's own law: plain words, no diagnosis, one clear request · checked Oct 21, 2026
Which state?
Each rule comes from the official source linked in the result. It runs on your device: nothing you type is stored or sent. General information, not legal advice.
Key points
- Who must accommodate
- Employers with 15 or more employees under the ADA (disability), the PWFA (pregnancy) and Title VII (religion). Many states go lower: California 5 or more, Pennsylvania 4 or more, Washington 8 or more, and New York, New Jersey and Connecticut any size.
- How to ask
- In plain English: you do not have to say "ADA" or "reasonable accommodation", and the request does not have to be in writing. Writing it down still helps: the letter below does it for you.
- Undue hardship
- Significant difficulty or expense for disability and pregnancy. For religion, since Groff v. DeJoy (June 29, 2023), a burden that is substantial in the overall context of the business, not any cost above a trifle.
- If you're denied
- File an EEOC charge within 180 days, or 300 days where a state agency enforces a similar law. State deadlines run from 6 months (Kansas, Wyoming) and 180 days (Texas, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and many others) to 3 years (California, New York) and 5 years (Oregon).
A reasonable accommodation is a change at work that lets you do your job. It can be a stool at a register, a later start time, a schedule that keeps your Sabbath free, leave for treatment, or a move to an open job you can do. Three federal laws require it: the Americans with Disabilities Act for disabilities, the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act for limitations related to pregnancy and childbirth, and Title VII for religious beliefs and practices. Each covers employers with 15 or more employees, and the employer may refuse only if the change would cause an undue hardship.
You start it by asking. The EEOC says you may use plain English and need not mention the ADA, and nothing has to be in writing, but a short letter gives you a date and a record. The employer is then expected to talk it through with you in what the law calls the interactive process. This page gives you the letter, the words for that meeting, worked examples with real dates, each state's law, and a calculator for the filing deadlines if the answer is no. For the charge itself, see filing an EEOC discrimination charge; for time off rather than a change at work, see FMLA leave.
What is a reasonable accommodation?
A reasonable accommodation is any change in the work environment or in the way things are customarily done that lets a qualified person work. That is the EEOC's own definition. The ADA's list is short and concrete: job restructuring, part-time or modified work schedules, reassignment to a vacant position, new or modified equipment, changes to tests, training materials or policies, and readers or interpreters. 42 U.S.C. § 12111(9) · 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o)
- Disability: the ADA. An employer with 15 or more employees for each working day in each of 20 or more calendar weeks must make reasonable accommodations to the known physical or mental limitations of a qualified employee or applicant, unless it can show undue hardship. Not doing so is itself discrimination.42 U.S.C. §§ 12111(5), 12112(b)(5)
- Pregnancy, childbirth and related conditions: the PWFA. Since June 27, 2023, employers with 15 or more employees must accommodate known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions. They may not force you to take leave, paid or unpaid, if another accommodation would let you keep working, and may not push an accommodation on you that was not worked out with you.42 U.S.C. § 2000gg-1
- Religion: Title VII. Title VII protects all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as belief, unless the employer shows it cannot reasonably accommodate them without undue hardship on the conduct of its business. That covers schedule changes and leave for observances, and dress or grooming practices.42 U.S.C. § 2000e(j)
- Asking is protected. It is unlawful to retaliate against you for requesting accommodation of a disability or for a religious practice, and the PWFA bars adverse action for requesting or using a pregnancy accommodation. If you are punished or fired for asking, see wrongful termination.EEOC: Retaliation · 42 U.S.C. § 2000gg-1
- You can say no to an accommodation. No one has to accept an accommodation. But if you turn down one that is needed to do the essential functions of the job, and cannot do them without it, you may no longer count as qualified.29 C.F.R. § 1630.9
Reasonable accommodation examples
These are the examples the laws and the EEOC name themselves. An employer may choose among accommodations that work, but your preference should be given primary consideration.
| Change | Examples | Where it is named |
|---|---|---|
| Schedule | Shorter hours, part-time work, a later start time, a modified schedule for treatment | 42 U.S.C. § 12111(9) · EEOC: PWFA |
| Breaks | Additional, longer or more flexible breaks to drink water, eat, rest or use the restroom; see also meal and rest break rules | EEOC: PWFA · 29 C.F.R. § 1636.3 |
| Equipment | A stool to sit on, new or modified equipment or devices, large-print notices | 42 U.S.C. § 12111(9) · IDHR: Employment rights |
| Duties | Job restructuring, light duty, help with lifting or other manual labor | 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o) · EEOC: PWFA |
| Leave | Leave for medical care or treatment, after you use your accrued paid leave | EEOC: Enforcement Guidance · CRD: Reasonable accommodation |
| Reassignment | Reassignment to a vacant position you can do | 42 U.S.C. § 12111(9) |
| Religion | Flexible scheduling, voluntary shift substitutions or swaps, job reassignments, changes to dress or grooming policies | EEOC: Religious Discrimination |
| Workplace | Making facilities accessible, relocating the work area | 42 U.S.C. § 12111(9) · CRD: Reasonable accommodation |
How to ask for a reasonable accommodation (with a request letter)
You can ask out loud, in any words. The EEOC says a request does not need to be in writing and you may use plain English without mentioning the ADA. A letter or email still helps: it fixes the date you asked, says exactly what you need, and gives HR something to answer. Use the generator at the top of this page.
- Say what is hard, not what you have. Describe the task and the limit: "standing for more than 2 hours", "lifting over my head", "working Saturdays". You do not need to name a diagnosis to ask.
- Ask for one specific change. A stool, a schedule, a break, a different task. Say you are open to other ideas that work: the employer may choose among accommodations that are effective.
- Send it to HR and your manager. Email is fine. Keep a copy, and note the date.
- Expect a request for documentation. For a disability that is not obvious, the employer may ask for reasonable documentation from an appropriate health care or rehabilitation professional, but in most situations it cannot ask for your complete medical records. Under the PWFA, documentation must be reasonable, and for carrying water, extra restroom breaks, sitting or standing, and breaks to eat and drink, a simple statement from you is normally enough.
- Ask for a written answer. The letter asks for a reply within 10 days. That is a practical request, not a legal deadline: no federal law sets a number of days, and the EEOC says only that an employer should respond expeditiously.
The interactive process: the meeting with HR
Once you ask, the employer is expected to talk with you in an informal, interactive process that identifies the precise limitations and the accommodations that could work. California makes failing to engage in a timely, good faith, interactive process a violation of its own, and Minnesota requires the employer to start that process. 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o)(3) · CRD: Reasonable accommodation · Minn. Stat. § 363A.08, subd. 6
“We need a doctor's note with your diagnosis.”
You can say: “I can get a note that confirms the limitation and what I need. The EEOC says you can ask for reasonable documentation, not my whole medical file.”
“We can't make exceptions for one person.”
You can say: “I'm asking for a reasonable accommodation, which the law requires unless it causes undue hardship. Is there a different change that would work for you?”
“Just take leave until you're better.”
You can say: “If a change would let me keep working, I would rather do that. For pregnancy, the PWFA does not allow forced leave when another accommodation can be provided.”
“We'll get back to you.”
You can say: “Thank you. Could I have the answer in writing, and a date when you expect to decide?”
How long should it take? No federal law sets a number of days. The EEOC says an employer should respond expeditiously and that unnecessary delays can result in a violation of the ADA. Keep a log of each request, reply and meeting with its date; if weeks pass with no answer, send a short written reminder. Practise the meeting with the AI mediator on this page before you go.
What is an undue hardship?
For disability and pregnancy, undue hardship means significant difficulty or expense. It is judged case by case against the employer's own size and money, so what is too much for a small shop may be routine for a national chain. 42 U.S.C. § 12111(10) · 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(p)
- the nature and cost of the accommodation needed;
- the overall financial resources of the facility, the number of persons employed there, and the effect on its expenses, resources and operation;
- the overall financial resources of the covered entity and the overall size of its business with respect to the number of its employees, and the number, type and location of its facilities;
- the type of operation, including the composition, structure and functions of the workforce.
The EEOC adds that undue hardship refers not only to financial difficulty but to accommodations that are unduly extensive, substantial or disruptive. An employer does not have to provide paid leave beyond what it provides to similarly situated employees. In Texas, the Workforce Commission must weigh the reasonableness of the cost and the availability of alternatives. EEOC: Enforcement Guidance · Tex. Lab. Code § 21.128
Pregnancy accommodation under the PWFA
The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act went into effect on June 27, 2023. The EEOC issued its final regulation on April 15, 2024, and it went into effect on June 18, 2024. It covers private employers and state and local governments with 15 or more employees. EEOC: What You Should Know About the PWFA · 29 C.F.R. part 1636
- Four changes that need almost no proof. Carrying or keeping water near and drinking as needed; additional restroom breaks; sitting when the work requires standing, or standing when it requires sitting; and breaks to eat and drink. For these, the EEOC rule treats documentation as unreasonable when you confirm your pregnancy in a simple statement, in any format.29 C.F.R. § 1636.3
- No forced leave. The employer may not require you to take leave, paid or unpaid, if another reasonable accommodation can be provided.42 U.S.C. § 2000gg-1
- Documentation only when reasonable. An employer is not required to ask for documentation and may ask only when it is reasonable; it may ask that the documentation come from a health care provider but may not require that you be examined.29 C.F.R. § 1636.3
- State laws add more. New York's law covers pregnancy-related conditions at employers of any size, and New Jersey's LAD covers pregnancy and lactation accommodations at employers with even one employee. Connecticut names the duty in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-60(b)(7).N.Y. Exec. Law § 296(3) · N.J.S.A. 10:5-12(s)
Religious accommodation after Groff v. DeJoy
On June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court changed the test. In Groff v. DeJoy, 600 U.S. 447, it held that showing "more than a de minimis cost" does not suffice to establish undue hardship under Title VII. Undue hardship is shown when a burden is substantial in the overall context of an employer's business. The EEOC says Groff supersedes any contrary information on its webpages.
- Other options must be considered. It is not enough for an employer to say that making coworkers work overtime would be an undue hardship: consideration of other options, such as voluntary shift swapping, is also necessary.Groff v. DeJoy, 600 U.S. 447 (2023)
- Common religious accommodations. Flexible scheduling, voluntary shift substitutions or swaps, job reassignments, and changes to workplace policies, including dress and grooming.EEOC: Religious Discrimination
- New York: a bona fide effort first. New York bars terms that would make you give up a sincerely held religious practice, including a Sabbath or holy day, unless the employer, after a bona fide effort, shows it cannot reasonably accommodate you without undue hardship.N.Y. Exec. Law § 296(10)
- Texas: the same rule in state law. Texas applies its discrimination law to every aspect of religious observance, practice and belief unless the employer cannot reasonably accommodate it without undue hardship.Tex. Lab. Code § 21.108
Three worked examples
1. A warehouse worker in Texas asks for a stool and breaks. She works for a distributor with 40 employees, so the ADA and Texas Labor Code chapter 21 both apply. After about 2 hours standing, back pain makes it unsafe to keep going. She asks for a stool at her packing station and a 10-minute break to sit every 2 hours. The employer says no on March 5, 2026.
- Texas Workforce Commission
- September 1, 2026180 days after March 5, 2026: already passed by October 21, 2026
- EEOC charge
- December 30, 2026300 days, because Texas has a state agency
- Lesson
- File earlythe state deadline ran out first; the federal one is still open
2. A pregnant cashier in Florida asks to sit and keep water at the register. Her store has 60 employees, so the PWFA applies. She asks for a stool and a water bottle at the register; under the EEOC rule these are among the four changes that need only her own statement. The manager refuses on May 27, 2026 and suggests unpaid leave instead, which the PWFA does not allow when another accommodation can be provided.
- EEOC charge
- March 23, 2027300 days after May 27, 2026
- Florida Commission on Human Relations
- May 27, 2027365 days after May 27, 2026
- First step
- Ask again in writingname the PWFA and the four changes; keep the reply
3. A religious schedule change in New York after Groff. A pharmacy technician at a hospital asks not to be scheduled from Friday sunset to Saturday sunset. The hospital says covering her shifts would cost overtime. After Groff, that alone is not enough: the hospital must look at options such as voluntary shift swaps, and show a burden that is substantial for a hospital of its size. It refuses on January 8, 2026.
- EEOC charge
- November 4, 2026300 days after January 8, 2026
- NY Division of Human Rights
- January 8, 20293 years, under the rule for discrimination on or after February 15, 2024
- Her next message
- Offer swapsname coworkers willing to swap and ask for a written answer
Reasonable accommodation laws by state: who is covered and the time to file
Federal law stops at 15 employees. Most states have their own law, many cover smaller employers, and many give you longer than the EEOC to file. Where a state agency enforces a similar law, the EEOC's 180 days become 300 days; Alabama and Mississippi have no state agency for these complaints, and in Arkansas, Georgia and North Carolina the state claim goes to court instead. Where a state's own sites could not be reached from our checking location, the row names the official page we read (often the EEOC office for that state). The California row cites the Civil Rights Department's own pages.
| State | Law | Employers covered | State agency: time to file | EEOC: time to file | In force since | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal (every state) | ADA, PWFA, Title VII | 15 or more employees | No state agency: EEOC only | 180 days | PWFA: June 27, 2023 · rule: June 18, 2024 | 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111(5), 12112(b)(5) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000gg-1 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(j) · EEOC: Time limits for filing a charge |
| Alabama | No general state law for private employers | 15 or more employees (federal law) | No state agency: EEOC only | 180 days | Current (EEOC Birmingham office) | EEOC Birmingham: timeliness |
| Alaska | Alaska Human Rights Law (AS 18.80) | Not checked for this page | State Commission for Human Rights: 300 days | 300 days | Current (EEOC Seattle office) | AS 18.80 · EEOC Seattle: timeliness |
| Arizona | Arizona Civil Rights Act | 15 or more employees | Attorney General’s Civil Rights Division: 180 days | 300 days | Current; no date shown | A.R.S. §§ 41-1461(7)(a), 41-1481(A) |
| Arkansas | Arkansas Civil Rights Act of 1993 | Not checked for this page | No state agency: suit in court within 1 year (or 90 days after an EEOC right-to-sue letter) | 180 days | 1993 Act, as stated by the Eighth Circuit (2013) | Ark. Code Ann. § 16-123-107(c)(3) · EEOC Little Rock: timeliness |
| California | Fair Employment and Housing Act | 5 or more employees | Civil Rights Department: 3 years | 300 days | Checked Oct 21, 2026 | California Fair Employment and Housing Act · CRD: Reasonable accommodation · CRD: Filing a complaint |
| Colorado | Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act | Any size (Civil Rights Division) | Civil Rights Division: 300 days | 300 days | August 10, 2022 (HB22-1367; was 6 months) | C.R.S. § 24-34-403 · CCRD · HB22-1367 |
| Connecticut | Conn. Gen. Stat. chapter 814c | 1 or more employees | Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities: 300 days | 300 days | October 1, 2021 (300 days) | Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 46a-51(10), 46a-60(b)(7) · Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-82(f) |
| Delaware | Persons with Disabilities Employment Protections Act | 4 or more employees | Department of Labor: 300 days (from the act or its discovery) | 300 days | Current; no date shown | 19 Del. C. §§ 710(7), 712(c)(1), 722(3) |
| District of Columbia | D.C. Human Rights Act | 1 or more employees | Office of Human Rights: 1 year (from the act or its discovery) | 300 days | Current; section last amended March 21, 2025 (D.C. Law 25-300) | D.C. Code §§ 2-1401.02(10), 2-1403.04(a), 32-1231.03 |
| Florida | Florida Statutes chapter 760 | 15 or more employees | Commission on Human Relations: 365 days | 300 days | Checked Oct 21, 2026 | Fla. Stat. §§ 760.02(7), 760.10(1)(a) · Fla. Stat. § 760.11(1) |
| Georgia | Georgia Equal Employment for Persons with Disabilities Code (deadline not checked for this page) | Not checked for this page | No state agency for private employers | 300 days (EEOC Atlanta office) | Current (EEOC Atlanta office) | EEOC Atlanta: timeliness · Georgia Commission on Equal Opportunity |
| Hawaii | Hawaii Employment Practices law (HRS chapter 378) | 1 or more employees | Civil Rights Commission: 1 year (was 180 days) | 300 days | May 28, 2026 (Act 56) | HRS §§ 378-1, 368-11 · Act 56 (2026) |
| Idaho | Idaho Human Rights Act | Not checked for this page | Human Rights Commission: 365 days | 300 days | Current (EEOC Seattle office) | Idaho Code § 67-5901 · EEOC Seattle: timeliness |
| Illinois | Illinois Human Rights Act | Every employer, for disability and pregnancy (1 employee) | Department of Human Rights: 2 years | 300 days | January 1, 2025 (2 years; was 300 days) | Illinois Human Rights Act · IDHR: Employment rights · IDHR: Public Act 103-0973 |
| Indiana | Indiana Civil Rights Law; Employment Discrimination Against Disabled Persons | 15 or more employees (disability) | Civil Rights Commission: 180 days | 300 days | Current; no date shown | IC 22-9-1 · IC 22-9-5-10(b) · ICRC: How to file |
| Iowa | Iowa Civil Rights Act | 4 or more employees | Office of Civil Rights: 300 days | 300 days | Iowa Code 2026; no date shown | Iowa Code §§ 216.6(6)(a), 216.15(13) |
| Kansas | Kansas Act Against Discrimination | 4 or more employees | Human Rights Commission: 6 months | 300 days | Section history ends July 1, 2007 | K.S.A. 44-1002(b), 44-1005(i) |
| Kentucky | Kentucky Civil Rights Act | 15 or more employees (disability) | Commission on Human Rights: 180 days | 300 days | KRS 344.200 last amended June 24, 2015 | KRS 344.030(2), 344.200(1) |
| Louisiana | Louisiana Employment Discrimination Law | 20 or more employees | Commission on Human Rights: 180 days (court: 1 year) | 300 days | Acts 1997, No. 1409 (August 1, 1997) | La. R.S. 23:302(2), 23:303(D), 51:2257(A) |
| Maine | Maine Human Rights Act | 1 or more employees | Human Rights Commission: 300 days | 300 days | Current; no date shown | 5 M.R.S. §§ 4553(4), 4611 |
| Maryland | Maryland Fair Employment Practices Act | 15 or more employees (harassment: 1 or more) | Commission on Civil Rights: 300 days (harassment: 2 years) | 300 days | Current; no date shown | Md. Code, State Gov’t §§ 20-601(d), 20-609, 20-1004(c)(2) |
| Massachusetts | Massachusetts Fair Employment Practices Law (c. 151B) | Not checked for this page | Commission Against Discrimination: 300 days | 300 days | 2002 (St. 2002, c. 223), per the First Circuit | M.G.L. c. 151B, § 5 |
| Michigan | Persons with Disabilities Civil Rights Act | Not checked for this page | Department of Civil Rights: 180 days | 300 days | Current (EEOC Detroit office) | MCL 37.1101 · EEOC Detroit: timeliness |
| Minnesota | Minn. Stat. chapter 363A | 1 or more employees (disability accommodation: 15 or more) | Department of Human Rights: 1 year | 300 days | Checked Oct 21, 2026 | Minn. Stat. § 363A.03, subd. 16 · § 363A.08, subd. 6 · Minn. Stat. § 363A.28, subd. 3 |
| Mississippi | No general state law for private employers | 15 or more employees (federal law) | No state agency: EEOC only | 180 days | Current (EEOC Jackson office) | EEOC Jackson: timeliness |
| Missouri | Missouri Human Rights Act | 6 or more employees | Commission on Human Rights: 180 days | 300 days | August 28, 2017 (S.B. 43) | Mo. Rev. Stat. §§ 213.010, 213.075.1 |
| Montana | Montana Human Rights Act | 1 or more employees | Human Rights Bureau: 180 days (from the act or its discovery) | 300 days | Last amended Ch. 28, L. 2007 | Mont. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-101(11), 49-2-501(4)(a), 49-2-501(4)(b) |
| Nebraska | Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act | 15 or more employees | Equal Opportunity Commission: 300 days | 300 days | Current; no date shown | Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1101 · NEOC: Employment |
| Nevada | Nevada employment discrimination law (NRS chapter 613) | Not checked for this page | Equal Rights Commission: 300 days | 300 days | Current (EEOC Las Vegas office) | NRS 613.310 · EEOC Las Vegas: timeliness |
| New Hampshire | Law Against Discrimination (RSA 354-A) | Not checked for this page | Commission for Human Rights: 180 days | 300 days | Current (federal court order, 2021) | RSA 354-A:21, III |
| New Jersey | Law Against Discrimination (LAD) | Any employer, even 1 employee | Division on Civil Rights: 180 days (Superior Court: 2 years) | 300 days | Checked Oct 21, 2026 | N.J.S.A. 10:5-5(e) · N.J.S.A. 10:5-12(s) · NJ Division on Civil Rights: Learn how to file a complaint |
| New Mexico | New Mexico Human Rights Act | Not checked for this page | Human Rights Bureau: 300 days | 300 days | Rule as amended October 10, 2023 | NMSA 1978, §§ 28-1-1, 28-1-10(A) · 9.1.1.8(B) NMAC |
| New York | New York State Human Rights Law | All employers, any size | Division of Human Rights: 3 years | 300 days | February 15, 2024 (3 years) | N.Y. Exec. Law §§ 292(5), 292(21-e), 296(3), 296(10) · N.Y. Exec. Law § 297(5) |
| North Carolina | Persons with Disabilities Protection Act (G.S. chapter 168A) | Not checked for this page | No state agency for private employers: suit in court within 180 days | 180 days | Current (federal court order, 2014) | N.C. Gen. Stat. § 168A-12 |
| North Dakota | North Dakota Human Rights Act | 1 or more employees | Department of Labor and Human Rights: 300 days | 300 days | Current; no date shown | N.D. Cent. Code §§ 14-02.4-02(8), 14-02.4-03(2), 14-02.4-19(2) |
| Ohio | Ohio Civil Rights Act (chapter 4112) | 4 or more employees | Civil Rights Commission: 2 years | 300 days | Current (Civil Rights Commission) | Ohio Rev. Code ch. 4112 · OCRC: Employment discrimination |
| Oklahoma | Oklahoma Anti-Discrimination Act | 1 or more employees | Attorney General’s Office of Civil Rights Enforcement: 180 days | 300 days | November 1, 2011 (Laws 2011, c. 270) | Okla. Stat. tit. 25, §§ 1301(1)(a), 1350(B) |
| Oregon | Oregon unlawful employment practices law (ORS chapter 659A) | 6 or more employees | Bureau of Labor and Industries: 5 years (incidents since September 29, 2019) | 300 days | September 29, 2019 | ORS 659A.112, 659A.820, 659A.875(1)(b) · BOLI: Discrimination at work |
| Pennsylvania | Pennsylvania Human Relations Act | 4 or more employees | Human Relations Commission: 180 days | 300 days | Checked Oct 21, 2026 | Pennsylvania Human Relations Act · PHRC · PHRC: File an employment discrimination complaint |
| Rhode Island | Fair Employment Practices Act (R.I. Gen. Laws chapter 28-5) | Not checked for this page | Commission for Human Rights: 1 year | 300 days | Commission rule effective January 8, 2019 | R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-5-17 · Commission rule 515-10-00-2 |
| South Carolina | South Carolina Human Affairs Law | 15 or more employees | Human Affairs Commission: 180 days | 300 days | Current; no date shown | S.C. Code Ann. §§ 1-13-20(e), 1-13-90(a) |
| South Dakota | South Dakota Human Relations Act | 1 or more employees | Division of Human Rights: 180 days | 300 days | SL 1981, ch 166 | S.D. Codified Laws §§ 20-13-1, 20-13-31 |
| Tennessee | Tennessee Disability Act | Not checked for this page | Attorney General’s Civil Rights Enforcement Division: 180 days | 300 days | 2025 (the division replaced the Human Rights Commission) | CRED: Frequently asked questions |
| Texas | Texas Labor Code chapter 21 | 15 or more employees | Texas Workforce Commission: 180 days | 300 days | September 1993 (180 days) | Tex. Lab. Code §§ 21.002(8), 21.108, 21.128 · Tex. Lab. Code § 21.202(a) |
| Utah | Utah Antidiscrimination Act | 15 or more employees | Antidiscrimination and Labor Division: 180 days | 300 days | May 8, 2018 | Utah Code Ann. §§ 34A-5-102(1)(i), 34A-5-107(1)(c) |
| Vermont | Vermont Fair Employment Practices Act | 1 or more employees | Attorney General’s Civil Rights Unit: 1 year (state guidance; suit within 6 years) | 300 days | Current (State of Vermont guidance) | Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 495d(1) · 12 V.S.A. § 525 · Workplaces For All (State of Vermont) |
| Virginia | Virginia Human Rights Act | 5 or more employees (accommodation: more than 5) | Attorney General’s Office of Civil Rights: 2 years (was 300 days) | 300 days | July 1, 2026 (2026 Acts ch. 950) | Va. Code Ann. §§ 2.2-3905, 2.2-3905.1, 2.2-3907(A), 2.2-3909 |
| Washington | Washington Law Against Discrimination (RCW 49.60) | 8 or more employees | Human Rights Commission: 6 months (pregnancy: 12 months) | 300 days | Checked Oct 21, 2026 | RCW 49.60 · WSHRC: Employment · WSHRC: Employment |
| West Virginia | West Virginia Human Rights Act | 12 or more employees | Human Rights Commission: 365 days | 300 days | Current; no date shown | W. Va. Code § 5-11-3(d) · WV Human Rights Commission |
| Wisconsin | Wisconsin Fair Employment Act | Not checked for this page | Equal Rights Division: 300 days (from the act or when you learned of it) | 300 days | Current; no date shown | Wis. Stat. §§ 111.31–111.395 · DWD: Discrimination in employment |
| Wyoming | Wyoming Fair Employment Practices | 2 or more employees | Department of Workforce Services: 6 months | 300 days | Current; no date shown | Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 27-9-102(b), 27-9-106(a) |
If your accommodation is denied: what to do next
- Ask for the reason in writing. Ask what other change the employer can offer. A denial with no talk about alternatives is a sign the interactive process did not happen.
- Offer another option. A different schedule, a trial period, a swap with a willing coworker. Write it down and send it.
- Check your deadlines today. Use the calculator here: the EEOC charge is due within 180 days, or 300 days where a state agency enforces a similar law; federal employees must contact an agency EEO Counselor within 45 days.
- File a charge. Start with the EEOC Public Portal, or with your state agency, which dual-files with the EEOC. The step-by-step is on filing an EEOC discrimination charge.
- Protect your job and your income. If you are fired or pushed out, see wrongful termination and read any severance agreement before you sign: it may waive these claims. If you lose the job, unemployment benefits may apply.
| If… | What to do | Good to know |
|---|---|---|
| The employer has fewer than 15 employees | Use your state law: California covers 5 or more, Pennsylvania 4 or more, Washington 8 or more; New York, New Jersey and Connecticut cover any size; Illinois covers every employer for disability and pregnancy. In Minnesota the disability accommodation duty starts at 15. | See the table above. |
| You were harassed or mocked after asking | Keep a dated log and report it in writing; harassment has its own rules. | Harassment and hostile work environment. |
| You cannot work at all for now | Ask about leave as an accommodation and check FMLA leave and paid sick days. | For a long-term disability, see a Social Security disability denial appeal. |
Date calculator · 52 states
Denied? Your last day to file, federal and state
Federal deadlines from the EEOC; each state's from its statute or civil rights agency · checked Oct 22, 2026
Which state?
Each rule comes from the official source linked in the result. It runs on your device: nothing you type is stored or sent. General information, not legal advice.
Getting help
You can file a charge yourself through the EEOC Public Portal or the state agency in the table. For advice on your facts, find a lawyer or legal aid. More rights at work are in the Work and wages guide.
Common questions
What does "reasonable accommodation" mean in the context of employment?
Any change in the work environment or in the way things are customarily done that lets a qualified person with a disability, a pregnancy-related limitation or a religious practice do the job or enjoy equal benefits of employment: a schedule, equipment, a break, a policy change, leave or reassignment.
Do you get paid during ADA leave?
Not necessarily. The EEOC says employers should let you use accrued paid leave first and then provide unpaid leave; they do not have to provide paid leave beyond what similarly situated employees get. Job-protected leave may also come from FMLA, and pay from paid sick days or a state program.
What qualifies as an ADA violation?
Among other things: not making reasonable accommodations to the known limitations of a qualified employee without showing undue hardship, denying a job because you would need an accommodation, unnecessary delays in responding, and retaliating against you for asking. See filing an EEOC charge.
How long does it take to process a reasonable accommodation request?
No federal law sets a number of days. The EEOC says an employer should respond expeditiously, and unnecessary delays can result in a violation of the ADA. Ask for a written answer, as the letter on this page does (it asks for a reply within 10 days, a practical request, not a legal deadline).
What are common mistakes in the reasonable accommodation process?
For workers: asking only out loud and keeping no record, refusing to talk about other options, and missing the 180-day or 300-day EEOC deadline. For employers: demanding full medical records, ignoring the request, forcing leave on a pregnant worker when another change would work, and refusing a religious accommodation for a small cost after Groff.
Do I need a doctor's note to ask for an accommodation?
Not to ask. If the disability or need is not obvious, the employer may ask for reasonable documentation from an appropriate health care professional, but not your complete medical records. For the four PWFA changes (water, restroom breaks, sitting or standing, breaks to eat and drink), your own statement is normally enough.
Is there a reasonable accommodation request form?
No form is required. Some employers have one, and California's Civil Rights Department publishes an optional package. The letter generator at the top of this page writes a request in plain words for federal law or your state's law.
What if my employer has fewer than 15 employees?
The ADA, the PWFA and Title VII do not apply, but state law may: California covers 5 or more, Pennsylvania 4 or more, Washington 8 or more, and New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and Illinois (for disability and pregnancy) cover employers with 1 or more employees.
Can I be fired for asking for an accommodation?
Firing or punishing you for requesting an accommodation is retaliation, which the EEOC enforces. File within the same 180-day or 300-day period; see wrongful termination for the other deadlines.
Official sources
- EEOC: Enforcement Guidance on Reasonable Accommodation and Undue Hardship under the ADA (issued October 17, 2002): plain English, no writing needed, interactive process, documentation, leave eeoc.gov
- 42 U.S.C. § 12111: ADA definitions (employer: 15 or more employees; reasonable accommodation; undue hardship and its factors) govinfo.gov
- 42 U.S.C. § 12112(b)(5): not making reasonable accommodations is discrimination govinfo.gov
- 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o), (p): reasonable accommodation, the interactive process, undue hardship govinfo.gov
- 29 C.F.R. § 1630.9: not making reasonable accommodation; no one must accept an accommodation govinfo.gov
- EEOC: What You Should Know About the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (in effect June 27, 2023; rule effective June 18, 2024) eeoc.gov
- 42 U.S.C. § 2000gg-1: PWFA unlawful practices (no forced leave, interactive process, no retaliation) govinfo.gov
- 29 C.F.R. § 1636.3: PWFA rule, predictable assessments and limits on documentation govinfo.gov
- 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(b), (j): Title VII employer (fifteen or more employees) and religious accommodation govinfo.gov
- Supreme Court of the United States: Groff v. DeJoy, 600 U.S. 447 (decided June 29, 2023) supremecourt.gov
- EEOC: Religious Discrimination (accommodation examples; Groff supersedes contrary EEOC text) eeoc.gov
- EEOC: Retaliation (requesting accommodation is protected activity) eeoc.gov
- EEOC: Time Limits for Filing a Charge (180 days; 300 days; 45 days for federal employees) eeoc.gov
- EEOC: Filing a Charge of Discrimination (EEOC Public Portal; dual filing with a state agency) eeoc.gov
- California Civil Rights Department: Employment (employers of 5 or more; three years to file) ca.gov
- California Civil Rights Department: Reasonable accommodation (timely, good faith, interactive process) ca.gov
- California Civil Rights Department: Filing a complaint (three years in employment cases; right-to-sue notice) ca.gov
- California Civil Rights Department: Request for Reasonable Accommodation package (optional form) ca.gov
- N.Y. Executive Law § 292: definitions (employer includes all employers; reasonable accommodation, 21-e) nysenate.gov
- N.Y. Executive Law § 296(3), (10): accommodation of disabilities, pregnancy-related conditions and religious observance nysenate.gov
- N.Y. Executive Law § 297(5): three years to file with the Division of Human Rights nysenate.gov
- New York State Division of Human Rights: File a complaint (three years for discrimination on or after February 15, 2024) ny.gov
- New Jersey Division on Civil Rights: Learn how to file a complaint (180 days; 2-year statute of limitations in Superior Court) njoag.gov
- New Jersey Division on Civil Rights: Guidance on Pregnancy-Related Workplace Accommodations (LAD covers employers with even one employee) njoag.gov
- Illinois Department of Human Rights: Employment rights (every employer covered for disability and pregnancy) illinois.gov
- Illinois Department of Human Rights: How the charge process works (2 years to file) illinois.gov
- Illinois Department of Human Rights: deadline extended from 300 days to 2 years, effective January 1, 2025 (Public Act 103-0973) illinois.gov
- Texas Labor Code chapter 21 (§§ 21.0015, 21.002(8), 21.108, 21.128, 21.202) texas.gov
- Florida Statutes § 760.02: definitions (Commission; employer of 15 or more employees) flsenate.gov
- Florida Statutes § 760.10: unlawful employment practices (religion, pregnancy, handicap) flsenate.gov
- Florida Statutes § 760.11(1): complaint within 365 days flsenate.gov
- Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission: File an employment discrimination complaint (4 or more employees; 180 days) pa.gov
- Washington State Human Rights Commission: Employment (8 or more employees; six months; twelve months for pregnancy) wa.gov
- Connecticut General Statutes chapter 814c (§§ 46a-51(10), 46a-60(b)(7), 46a-82(f)) ct.gov
- Minnesota Statutes § 363A.03, subd. 16: employer means one or more employees mn.gov
- Minnesota Statutes § 363A.08, subd. 6: reasonable accommodation (employers with 15 or more), interactive process mn.gov
- Minnesota Statutes § 363A.28, subd. 3: charge within one year mn.gov
- EEOC Birmingham District Office - Time limits for filing a charge U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- EEOC Seattle Field Office - Time limits for filing a charge U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- A.R.S. § 41-1481 (charges; time limit) Arizona State Legislature
- Arizona Attorney General, Civil Rights Division - Employment discrimination Arizona Attorney General
- A.R.S. § 41-1461 (definitions) Arizona State Legislature
- A.R.S. § 41-1463 (unlawful employment practices) Arizona State Legislature
- EEOC Phoenix District Office - Time limits for filing a charge U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Cir., No. 12-2657 (2013, unpublished) U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Cir., Jackson v. Rent-Way, No. 03-2288 (2004) U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
- Supreme Court of Arkansas, Smith v. ConAgra Foods, 2013 Ark. 502 (Dec. 5, 2013) Arkansas Judiciary
- EEOC Little Rock Area Office - Time limits for filing a charge U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Colorado Civil Rights Division - Discrimination (employment) Colorado Civil Rights Division
- Colorado Civil Rights Division - Complaint process (deadlines) Colorado Civil Rights Division
- Colorado General Assembly - HB22-1367 Colorado General Assembly
- EEOC Denver Field Office - Time limits for filing a charge U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- 19 Del. C. ch. 7, subch. II (§§ 710-719A), Discrimination in Employment Delaware Code Online
- 19 Del. C. ch. 7, subch. III (§§ 720-728), Persons with Disabilities Employment Protections Act Delaware Code Online
- Delaware Department of Labor, Division of Industrial Affairs - Anti-Discrimination Delaware Department of Labor
- EEOC Philadelphia District Office - Time limits for filing a charge U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- D.C. Code § 2-1403.04 (filing of complaints) Council of the District of Columbia
- DC Office of Human Rights - File a discrimination complaint DC Office of Human Rights
- D.C. Code § 2-1401.02 (definitions) Council of the District of Columbia
- D.C. Code § 32-1231.03 (pregnant and nursing workers) Council of the District of Columbia
- EEOC Washington Field Office - Time limits for filing a charge U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- EEOC Atlanta District Office: timeliness (Georgia: 300 days) U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Georgia Commission on Equal Opportunity - home Georgia Commission on Equal Opportunity
- Georgia Commission on Equal Opportunity - Employment FAQ Georgia Commission on Equal Opportunity
- Hawaii Civil Rights Commission - Act 56 (2026) extends the statute of limitations Hawaii Civil Rights Commission
- Hawaii Civil Rights Commission - FAQs Hawaii Civil Rights Commission
- Hawaii Civil Rights Commission - Sexual Harassment in the Workplace flyer (2014) Hawaii Civil Rights Commission
- EEOC Honolulu Local Office - Time limits for filing a charge U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Indiana Civil Rights Commission - How to file Indiana Civil Rights Commission
- Indiana Civil Rights Commission - File a discrimination complaint Indiana Civil Rights Commission
- IC 22-9-5 (Employment Discrimination Against Disabled Persons), copy posted by the Indiana Civil Rights Commission Indiana Civil Rights Commission
- Indiana Civil Rights Commission - Employment Indiana Civil Rights Commission
- EEOC Indianapolis District Office - Time limits for filing a charge U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Iowa Code § 216.15 (2026) Iowa Legislature
- Iowa Office of Civil Rights - File a complaint Iowa Office of Civil Rights
- Iowa Code § 216.6 (2026) Iowa Legislature
- EEOC Milwaukee Area Office - Time limits for filing a charge U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- K.S.A. 44-1005 (complaints) Kansas Office of Revisor of Statutes
- K.S.A. 44-1002 (definitions) Kansas Office of Revisor of Statutes
- EEOC Kansas City Area Office - Time limits for filing a charge U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- KRS 344.200 (complaints) Kentucky Legislative Research Commission
- KRS 344.030 (definitions) Kentucky Legislative Research Commission
- Kentucky General Assembly - 2026 RS HB 468 record Kentucky Legislative Research Commission
- EEOC Louisville Area Office - Time limits for filing a charge U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- La. R.S. 51:2257 (complaints to the Commission on Human Rights) Louisiana State Legislature
- La. R.S. 23:302 (definitions) Louisiana State Legislature
- La. R.S. 23:303 (civil suit) Louisiana State Legislature
- La. R.S. 23:322 (disability definitions) Louisiana State Legislature
- Office of the Governor - Louisiana Commission on Human Rights Office of the Governor of Louisiana
- EEOC New Orleans Field Office - Time limits for filing a charge U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- 5 M.R.S. § 4611 Maine Legislature
- Maine Human Rights Commission - FAQ Maine Human Rights Commission
- 5 M.R.S. § 4553 (definitions) Maine Legislature
- EEOC Boston Area Office - Time limits for filing a charge U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Md. Code, State Gov't § 20-1004 Maryland General Assembly
- Maryland Commission on Civil Rights - Start a complaint inquiry Maryland Commission on Civil Rights
- Md. Code, State Gov't § 20-601 (definitions) Maryland General Assembly
- Md. Code, State Gov't § 20-606 Maryland General Assembly
- Md. Code, State Gov't § 20-609 Maryland General Assembly
- EEOC Baltimore Field Office - Time limits for filing a charge U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- U.S. Court of Appeals, 1st Cir., Rae v. Woburn Public Schools, No. 23-1432 (Aug. 22, 2024) U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (govinfo)
- U.S. Court of Appeals, 1st Cir., Windross v. Barton Protective Services, No. 08-2254 (2009) U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
- EEOC Detroit Field Office - Time limits for filing a charge U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- EEOC Jackson Area Office - Time limits for filing a charge U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- RSMo § 213.075 Missouri Revisor of Statutes
- RSMo § 213.010 Definitions Missouri Revisor of Statutes
- Missouri Commission on Human Rights home Missouri Department of Labor and Industrial Relations
- MCA 49-2-501 Filing complaints Montana Legislature (MCA 2025)
- MCA 49-2-101 Definitions Montana Legislature (MCA 2025)
- Human Rights Bureau Montana Department of Labor & Industry
- NEOC: Employment Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission
- NEOC: Complaint Process Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission
- EEOC Las Vegas Local Office: timeliness (Nevada: 300 days) U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- U.S. District Court, D.N.H., No. 1:21-cv-00596 (order filed 10/25/21) govinfo.gov (U.S. Courts)
- 9.1.1 NMAC (Human Rights general provisions) New Mexico State Records Center and Archives
- N.M. Court of Appeals, Slusser (2024) New Mexico Court of Appeals
- New Mexico Human Rights Act Enforcement notice New Mexico Judicial Branch (reproducing DWS notice)
- U.S. District Court, M.D.N.C., No. 1:14-cv-00177 (filed 05/23/14) govinfo.gov (U.S. Courts)
- OAH Civil Rights Division North Carolina Office of Administrative Hearings
- N.D.C.C. chapter 14-02.4 North Dakota Legislative Branch
- Employment Discrimination North Dakota Department of Labor and Human Rights
- OCRC: Employment Discrimination Ohio Civil Rights Commission
- OCRC brochure "Did you know" (2023) Ohio Civil Rights Commission
- Oklahoma Statutes Title 25 (compiled PDF, posted 2022-05) Oklahoma State Senate
- OCRE: Complaints Oklahoma Office of the Attorney General
- OCRE Employment Discrimination Complaint form (rev. 02-18) Oklahoma Office of the Attorney General
- BOLI: Discrimination at Work Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries
- U.S. District Court, D. Or., Denton v. Shriners Hospital, No. 3:23-cv-00826 (F&R filed 12/02/24) govinfo.gov (U.S. Courts)
- RI Commission for Human Rights: Procedure (Part 515-10-00-2) Rhode Island Department of State (Code of Regulations)
- R.I. Supreme Court, Horn v. Southern Union Co., No. 2006-217-M.P. Rhode Island Supreme Court
- S.C. Code Title 1, Chapter 13 South Carolina Legislature
- SDCL 20-13-31 South Dakota Legislature
- SDCL 20-13-1 Definitions South Dakota Legislature
- SDCL 20-13-10 South Dakota Legislature
- SDCL 20-13-28 South Dakota Legislature
- CRED FAQ Office of the Tennessee Attorney General
- CRED's Complaint Process Office of the Tennessee Attorney General
- About CRED Office of the Tennessee Attorney General
- tn.gov/humanrights (now CRED) State of Tennessee
- Utah Code 34A-5-107 (version effective 5/8/2018) Utah Legislature
- Utah Code 34A-5-102 (version effective 5/7/2025) Utah Legislature
- Reporting Harassment or Discrimination at Work State of Vermont, Vermont Commission on Women (Workplaces For All)
- Employment Law (Civil Rights Unit) Office of the Vermont Attorney General
- 21 V.S.A. chapter 5 Vermont General Assembly
- 12 V.S.A. § 525 Vermont General Assembly
- Va. Code § 2.2-3907 (page dated 10/22/2026) Virginia General Assembly (LIS)
- Va. Code § 2.2-3905 Virginia General Assembly (LIS)
- Va. Code § 2.2-3905.1 Virginia General Assembly (LIS)
- Va. Code § 2.2-3909 Virginia General Assembly (LIS)
- 2026 General Assembly Session - Legislation Tracked by DHRM (updated 5/22/26) Virginia Department of Human Resource Management
- Va. Const. art. IV, § 13 Virginia General Assembly (LIS)
- Human Rights Commission West Virginia Office of Inspector General / WV Human Rights Commission
- Supreme Court of Appeals of WV, Pajak v. Under Armour, No. 21-0484 (Jan. 2022 Term) Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
- Discrimination in Employment Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
- Disability Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
- Wisconsin Fair Employment Law poster Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
- Wyoming Statutes Title 27 (compiled PDF) Wyoming Legislature
- Your Rights as a Worker Wyoming Department of Workforce Services
Related
This page explains the law in general terms. It is not legal advice about your situation. Justice is not a law firm and is not affiliated with any court or government agency.