Your rights
Non-compete agreements: are they enforceable in your state?
Short answer
Often not. California, Minnesota, North Dakota, Oklahoma and Wyoming void most non-competes; 11 other states and DC void them below a pay level or for hourly workers, such as under $126,858.83 in Washington or $130,014 in Colorado. The FTC's nationwide ban never took effect. Elsewhere, courts enforce only reasonable limits on time, area and work.
Checker · 51 states
Is your non-compete enforceable? Your state's rule applied to your pay and your dates
Each state read from its statute, agency or attorney general; where a state's site refused us, from the FTC's Federal Register digest · checked Oct 22, 2026
Which state?
Each rule comes from the official source linked in the result. It runs on your device: nothing you type is stored or sent. General information, not legal advice.
Key points
- Federal rule
- The FTC's 2024 ban is not in effect: a court stopped it on August 20, 2024, and on September 5, 2025 the FTC voted 3-1 to drop its appeals. It now acts case by case, as against Gateway Services and Rollins.
- Bans
- California, Minnesota (signed since July 1, 2023), North Dakota, Oklahoma and Wyoming (signed since July 1, 2025) void most non-competes. Washington joins them on June 30, 2027.
- Pay floors
- Below a set pay a non-compete is void: $162,164 in DC, $130,014 in Colorado, $126,858.83 in Washington, $119,541 in Oregon, $75,000 in Illinois, $1,507.01 a week in Virginia (2026 figures).
- Everywhere else
- Courts enforce a non-compete only if it protects a real business interest and is reasonable in time, area and scope. Several states cap the length: 12 months in Massachusetts, Oregon and Utah, two years in Louisiana and South Dakota.
A non-compete is a promise not to work for a competitor, or start a competing business, for a time after you leave a job, and whether it binds you depends almost entirely on your state. Five states void most of them, 11 more states and DC void them for workers below a pay level or for hourly and non-exempt workers, and the rest let courts enforce only reasonable ones. The Federal Trade Commission's 2024 rule that would have banned most non-competes nationwide never took effect: a federal court set it aside, and in 2025 the FTC dropped its appeals and turned to case-by-case enforcement.
Below: a checker that applies your state's rule to your pay, your job type and your dates, the difference between a non-compete, a non-solicitation agreement and an NDA, where the FTC ban stands with every date, all 50 states and DC in one table with the law and the date it took effect, how courts judge reasonableness, worked examples with real numbers, whether you can say no or negotiate, what happens if you break one, two letters you can send, and the answers to common questions. If you were fired or pushed out, see also wrongful termination. This page explains the law; it is not legal advice.
What a non-compete is, and what it is not
The New York Attorney General defines it simply: a noncompete agreement prohibits an employee from working for a competitor or opening a competing business, typically for a certain period of time after an employee leaves a job. It may be one section of your employment contract or a separate paper you sign before or after you start. Minnesota's statute adds the usual three forms: a promise not to work for another employer for a specified time, in a specified area, or in a similar capacity. New York Attorney General: Noncompete agreements · Minn. Stat. § 181.988, subd. 1
| Clause | What it stops | How the law treats it |
|---|---|---|
| Non-compete | Working for a competitor, or starting a competing business, for a time and in an area | Void in five states, void below a pay floor in others, otherwise enforced only if reasonable |
| Non-solicitation of customers | Asking the employer's customers to move their business to you | Often treated more leniently: Minnesota's ban does not cover it, and Oklahoma lets an employer stop you from directly soliciting its established customers |
| Non-solicitation of employees | Recruiting your former co-workers | Missouri presumes a written covenant of one year or less reasonable; Oklahoma does not treat it as a restraint of trade |
| Nondisclosure (NDA) | Using or sharing trade secrets and confidential information | Minnesota's ban excludes them and Virginia's law does not limit them; the Texas Workforce Commission calls them usually easier to enforce |
| Garden leave | You stay on the payroll, or are paid, while you are kept out of the market | Oregon and Massachusetts tie pay to the restricted period; Florida allows a covered garden leave agreement of up to 4 years |
| No-poach agreement | Two employers agreeing not to hire each other's workers | Not between you and your employer at all; the Washington Attorney General treats it as an antitrust matter |
Did the FTC ban non-competes? Where the federal rule stands
No: the FTC's nationwide ban never took effect, and it has been removed. The FTC published its Non-Compete Clause Rule in the Federal Register on May 7, 2024. Its own page now says: "The Noncompete Rule is not in effect and it is not enforceable." What replaced it is enforcement against particular employers under the FTC Act, one case at a time. FTC: Noncompete Rule · 89 FR 38342
- May 7, 2024
The FTC publishes the Non-Compete Clause Rule, which would have made most non-competes an unfair method of competition.
- August 20, 2024
A federal district court issues an order stopping the FTC from enforcing the rule, finding the FTC lacks the authority.
- October 18, 2024
The FTC appeals.
- September 4, 2025
The FTC orders pet cremation company Gateway Services to stop enforcing non-competes that covered almost all of its nearly 1,800 employees.
- September 5, 2025
The FTC votes 3-1 to dismiss its appeals, including Ryan, LLC v. FTC in the Fifth Circuit, and to accede to the vacatur of the rule.
- September 10, 2025
The FTC Chairman sends warning letters to several large healthcare employers and staffing firms about their non-competes.
- November 25, 2025
The FTC finalizes the Gateway consent order.
- January 27, 2026
The FTC holds a workshop on employee non-compete agreements.
- February 12, 2026
A Federal Register notice removes the Non-Compete Rule to conform to the federal court decisions.
- April 15, 2026
The FTC orders pest-control company Rollins to stop enforcing non-competes against more than 18,000 employees; the order is finalized on June 22, 2026.
- May 8, 2026
The FTC Chairman sends a warning letter to mortgage services provider Mortgage Connect.
Non-compete laws by state
The rules the checker uses, read from each state's statute, agency or attorney general on October 22, 2026, with 2026 pay figures. Where a state's own sites refused requests from here, the row says so and relies on the FTC's published digest of state law (Federal Register, January 19, 2023 and May 7, 2024). In every state without a ban, courts also ask whether the agreement is reasonable: in the FTC's words, "In the 47 states where at least some non-compete clauses may be enforced, courts use a reasonableness inquiry". 88 FR 3482 · 89 FR 38342 · the state sources listed at the end of this page
| State | Rule | Pay floor | Longest allowed | Notice before signing | In force since | Law |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Courts: reasonableness test (state law not checked) | Not checked | Courts decide (not checked) | Not checked | Common law | Common law |
| Alaska | Courts: reasonableness test (state law not checked) | Not checked | Courts decide (not checked) | Not checked | Common law | Common law |
| Arizona | Courts: reasonableness test (state law not checked) | Not checked | Courts decide (not checked) | Not checked | Common law | Common law |
| Arkansas | Limits: 2 years presumed reasonable | None | 2 years presumed reasonable | None | Act 921 of 2015 | Ark. Code § 4-75-101 (Act 921 of 2015) |
| California | Banned (void) | Not needed: void at any pay | Not allowed | Employers had to tell workers by February 14, 2024 that clauses are void | Void since 1872; illegal to sign or enforce since January 1, 2024 | Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 16600, 16600.1, 16600.5 |
| Colorado | Pay floor | At least $130,014 a year (2026) | No number read | Not read for this page | August 10, 2022 | C.R.S. § 8-2-113; 7 CCR 1103-14 |
| Connecticut | Courts; physicians limited | Not checked | Physicians: one year, fifteen miles | Not checked | Physicians: July 1, 2016 | Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 20-14p, 31-50a, 31-50b |
| Delaware | Courts: reasonableness test (state law not checked) | Not checked | Courts decide (not checked) | Not checked | Common law | Common law |
| District of Columbia | Pay floor | $162,164 a year or more (2026) | 365 days (about 12 months) | In writing 14 days before | October 1, 2022 | D.C. Code §§ 32-581.01 to 32-581.05 |
| Florida | Limits: presumptions; CHOICE Act for high earners | None (CHOICE Act: twice the county mean wage) | 6 months presumed reasonable, over 2 years presumed unreasonable; up to 4 years under the CHOICE Act | CHOICE Act: 7 days before the offer expires | CHOICE Act: July 1, 2025 | Fla. Stat. §§ 542.335, 542.43, 542.45 |
| Georgia | Courts: reasonableness test (state law not checked) | Not checked | Courts decide (not checked) | Not checked | Common law | Common law |
| Hawaii | Courts; banned for tech workers | Not checked | Reasonable | Not checked | Tech workers: July 1, 2015 | Haw. Rev. Stat. § 480-4(d) |
| Idaho | Courts: reasonableness test (state law not checked) | Not checked | Courts decide (not checked) | Not checked | Common law | Common law |
| Illinois | Pay floor | Over $75,000 a year | No number read | Not read for this page | In force (Attorney General, November 14, 2024) | 820 ILCS 90/10 |
| Indiana | Courts; physicians limited | Not checked | Reasonable | Not checked | Common law | Ind. Code §§ 25-22.5-5.5-2, 25-22.5-5.5-2.5 |
| Iowa | Courts; banned for health care agency workers | Not checked | Reasonable | Not checked | Common law | Iowa Code § 135Q.2(3) |
| Kansas | Courts: reasonableness test (state law not checked) | Not checked | Courts decide (not checked) | Not checked | Common law | Common law |
| Kentucky | Courts; banned for agency direct care staff | Not checked | Reasonable | Not checked | Common law | Ky. Rev. Stat. § 216.724(1)(a) |
| Louisiana | Limits: named parishes, 2 years | None | 24 months (two years) | None | Physician rules: January 1, 2025 | La. R.S. 23:921 |
| Maine | Pay floor; banned for health-care practitioners and veterinarians without ownership | Over $63,840 a year (400% of the 2026 poverty line) | No number in the statute | Copy 3 business days before signing | September 19, 2019 | 26 M.R.S. § 599-A |
| Maryland | Pay floor; banned for vets and health-care workers at $350,000 or less | Over $22.50 an hour (about $46,800 a year) | 1 year for health-care workers over $350,000 | None | Health-care rules: agreements from July 1, 2025 | Md. Code, Lab. & Empl. § 3-716 |
| Massachusetts | Void for non-exempt workers; garden leave required | None (non-exempt workers protected) | 12 months | Prior notice required | In force (FTC digest, 2023) | M.G.L. c. 149, § 24L |
| Michigan | Courts: reasonableness test (state law not checked) | Not checked | Courts decide (not checked) | Not checked | Common law | Common law |
| Minnesota | Banned for agreements signed on or after July 1, 2023 | Not needed: void at any pay | Not allowed | None | July 1, 2023 | Minn. Stat. § 181.988 |
| Mississippi | Courts: reasonableness test (state law not checked) | Not checked | Courts decide (not checked) | Not checked | Common law | Common law |
| Missouri | Courts; employee non-solicit 1 year | Not checked | Reasonable | Not checked | Common law | RSMo § 431.202 |
| Montana | Courts: statute voids restraints; courts allow reasonable ones | None | Reasonable | None | Long-standing | Mont. Code Ann. § 28-2-703 |
| Nebraska | Courts: reasonableness test (state law not checked) | Not checked | Courts decide (not checked) | Not checked | Common law | Common law |
| Nevada | Limits: not for hourly workers | None (hourly workers protected) | No number read | None read | October 1, 2021 (hourly rule) | NRS 613.195 |
| New Hampshire | Pay floor | Over $14.50 an hour (about $30,160 a year) | No number read | Copy before you accept the offer | September 8, 2019 | RSA 275:70, 275:70-a |
| New Jersey | Courts: reasonableness test (state law not checked) | Not checked | Courts decide (not checked) | Not checked | Common law | Common law |
| New Mexico | Courts; banned for several health care practitioners | Not checked | Reasonable | Not checked | Common law | N.M. Stat. §§ 24-1I-1, 24-1I-2 |
| New York | Courts: four-part test | None | Reasonable | None | Common law | N.Y. Lab. Law § 202-k (broadcast) |
| North Carolina | Courts: reasonableness test (state law not checked) | Not checked | Courts decide (not checked) | Not checked | Common law | Common law |
| North Dakota | Banned (void) | Not needed: void at any pay | Not allowed | None | Void since 1865 | N.D. Cent. Code § 9-08-06 |
| Ohio | Courts: reasonableness test (state law not checked) | Not checked | Courts decide (not checked) | Not checked | Common law | Common law |
| Oklahoma | Banned, but a ban on soliciting established customers is allowed | Not needed | Not allowed | None | June 4, 2001 (§ 219A) | 15 O.S. §§ 217, 219A, 219B |
| Oregon | Pay floor and exempt salaried workers only | Over $119,541 a year (2026) | 12 months | Written notice two weeks before you start | January 1, 2022 | ORS 653.295 |
| Pennsylvania | Courts: reasonableness test (state law not checked) | Not checked | Courts decide (not checked) | Not checked | Common law | Common law |
| Rhode Island | Void for non-exempt workers | None read (non-exempt workers protected) | No number read | None read | January 15, 2020 | R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-59-3 |
| South Carolina | Courts: reasonableness test (state law not checked) | Not checked | Courts decide (not checked) | Not checked | Common law | Common law |
| South Dakota | Limits: specified area, 2 years | None | 24 months (two years) | None | Practitioners: July 1, 2023 | SDCL §§ 53-9-8, 53-9-11, 53-9-11.2 |
| Tennessee | Courts: reasonableness test (state law not checked) | Not checked | Courts decide (not checked) | Not checked | Common law | Common law |
| Texas | Limits: ancillary and reasonable; health-care caps | None | Reasonable; 1 year for health-care practitioners | None | Health-care rules: September 1, 2025 | Tex. Bus. & Com. Code §§ 15.50, 15.501 |
| Utah | Limits: 1 year; banned for health care and vets from May 6, 2026 | None | 12 months (one year) | None | May 10, 2016 | Utah Code §§ 34-51-201, 34-51-202 |
| Vermont | Courts: reasonableness test (state law not checked) | Not checked | Courts decide (not checked) | Not checked | Common law | Common law |
| Virginia | Pay floor; void for overtime-eligible workers and health-care professionals | $1,507.01 a week or more (about $78,364.52 a year) | No number in the statute | Severance must be disclosed at signing (agreements from July 1, 2026) | July 1, 2020 | Va. Code § 40.1-28.7:8 |
| Washington | Pay floor; banned for all from June 30, 2027 | Over $126,858.83 a year (2026) | 18 months presumed the limit | In writing by the time you accept the offer | January 1, 2020 | RCW 49.62.020, 49.62.040 |
| West Virginia | Courts: reasonableness test (state law not checked) | Not checked | Courts decide (not checked) | Not checked | Common law | Common law |
| Wisconsin | Courts: reasonableness test (state law not checked) | Not checked | Courts decide (not checked) | Not checked | Common law | Common law |
| Wyoming | Banned for agreements signed on or after July 1, 2025 (managers and trade secrets excepted) | Not needed | Not allowed | None | July 1, 2025 | Wyo. Stat. § 1-23-108 |
- Wyoming: void since July 1, 2025, with exceptions. Exceptions: the sale of a business, protecting trade secrets, executive and management personnel and their professional staff, and recovery of relocation, education and training costs: up to 100% if you leave within 2 years, 66% between 2 and 3 years, 33% between 3 and 4 years. Non-competes that keep physicians from practicing are void.Wyo. Stat. § 1-23-108
- Maine: a waiting period and a fine. Even a lawful non-compete does not take effect until after 1 year of employment or 6 months after signing, whichever is later (health-care practitioners aside). An employer that breaks the pay floor or notice rule faces a fine of at least $5,000.26 M.R.S. § 599-A(5), (6)
- Maryland: health care and veterinarians. Void for veterinarians and for licensed health-care workers giving direct patient care who earn $350,000 a year or less, for agreements from July 1, 2025. Above $350,000, the limit is 1 year after the last day and 10 miles from the primary place of employment. From October 1, 2026, Chapter 301 adds some employees of licensed architects. The pay floor is 150% of the $15 minimum wage: $22.50 an hour, about $46,800 for a 2,080-hour year.Md. Code, Lab. & Empl. § 3-716
- Virginia: low pay, overtime, health care, and no severance. Void for anyone whose average weekly earnings are below $1,507.01 (about $78,364.52 a year), for anyone entitled to federal overtime, and from July 1, 2026 for licensed health-care professionals. For agreements from July 1, 2026, a non-compete cannot be enforced if you are let go without cause and without the severance disclosed when you signed. The civil penalty is $10,000 per violation, and you may sue within 2 years.Va. Code § 40.1-28.7:8
- DC: 365 days and 14 days. For employees earning $162,164 or more, the agreement must be given in writing 14 days before you start or sign, and may last at most 365 calendar days after you leave: 730 days for medical specialists earning $270,274 or more.D.C. Code § 32-581.03
- Florida: presumptions, and the CHOICE Act. For a former employee, 6 months or less is presumed reasonable and more than 2 years unreasonable. Since July 1, 2025, a covered employee, paid more than twice the annual mean wage of the county, can be bound for up to 4 years if advised in writing to seek counsel and given the agreement at least 7 days before the offer expires. Health-care practitioners are excluded.Fla. Stat. §§ 542.335(1)(d), 542.43, 542.45
- Utah: one year, and health care and vets from May 6, 2026. A non-compete signed on or after May 10, 2016 may not last more than one year after you leave. From May 6, 2026, a non-compete with a healthcare worker is not allowed, nor with a veterinarian who owns less than 5% of the business.Utah Code § 34-51-201
- Hourly and non-exempt workers. A Nevada non-compete may not apply to an employee paid only by the hour. Massachusetts and Rhode Island do not enforce them against workers who are non-exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act, Virginia voids them for anyone entitled to federal overtime, and Oregon allows them only for salaried exempt employees. New Hampshire uses pay: 200% of the $7.25 federal minimum wage, $14.50 an hour, about $30,160 a year.NRS 613.195(3) · M.G.L. c. 149, § 24L(c) · R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-59-3(a)(1) · RSA 275:70-a · 29 U.S.C. § 206
Is my non-compete enforceable? What courts look at
Outside the ban states, the question is reasonableness. The New York Attorney General's four conditions are a good map of what most courts ask; a court will not enforce a noncompete unless it meets all of them. New York Attorney General
- It is necessary to protect the employer's legitimate interests, such as trade secrets, confidential information, or specialized skills gained on the job.
- It does not put an unnecessary hardship on you.
- It does not harm the public.
- It is reasonable in time period and geographic scope, and no greater than needed to protect those interests.
- Texas: ancillary and reasonable. Texas law enforces a covenant not to compete only if it is ancillary to or part of an otherwise enforceable agreement and contains reasonable limitations as to time, geographical area and scope of activity. The Texas Workforce Commission notes that the employer must show how non-enforcement would harm it.Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 15.50 · Texas Workforce Commission
- A court may cut it down, or throw it out. If parts are unreasonable, the New York Attorney General says a court may invalidate the agreement entirely, or enforce it for a shorter time or in a smaller area.New York Attorney General
- Length limits and presumptions. Some states put a number on reasonable: 12 months in Oregon, Utah and Massachusetts, 365 days in DC, two years in Louisiana and South Dakota. Others presume: Washington presumes more than 18 months unreasonable, Arkansas presumes two years reasonable, and Florida presumes 6 months or less reasonable and more than 2 years unreasonable.ORS 653.295 · La. R.S. 23:921 · SDCL 53-9-11 · RCW 49.62.020 · Ark. Code § 4-75-101 · Fla. Stat. § 542.335
- Health-care workers have their own rules. Many states limit non-competes for physicians or other health-care workers: Connecticut (one year, fifteen miles for physicians), Texas, Maryland, Virginia, Maine, Utah, Oregon (Senate Bill 951 of 2025, changed by HB 3410), South Dakota, Indiana, New Mexico, Iowa and Kentucky among them. Check your state's row.Conn. Gen. Stat. § 20-14p · the state rows above
Worked examples with real numbers
Example 1: the same $65,000 salaried job in four states. An exempt, salaried worker earning $65,000 a year signed a 12-month non-compete and is leaving. L&I · 7 CCR 1103-14 · Oregon BOLI · 88 FR 3482
- Washington
- Void$65,000 is not more than $126,858.83, the 2026 floor.
- Colorado
- Void$65,000 is below $130,014, the 2026 highly compensated figure.
- Oregon
- Void, unless paid garden leave$65,000 is not more than $119,541. The employer could still enforce it only by paying, for the 12 months, the greater of 50% of $65,000 ($32,500) or 50% of $119,541 ($59,770.50).
- Massachusetts
- Not void for payAn exempt worker can be bound, but only for 12 months at most, with prior notice and garden leave pay.
Example 2: Minnesota, a month apart. Two co-workers signed the same 12-month non-compete: one on June 15, 2023, the other on July 15, 2023. Both leave on October 22, 2026. Minn. Stat. § 181.988 · Minnesota Session Laws 2023, chapter 53
- Signed June 15, 2023
- Courts decideBefore July 1, 2023, so the ban does not reach it; a court asks whether it is reasonable.
- If enforced, it ends
- October 22, 2027October 22, 2026 + 12 months.
- Signed July 15, 2023
- VoidOn or after July 1, 2023: void and unenforceable, and a court may award attorney fees.
- Still binding for both
- Non-solicitation and NDAMinnesota's ban does not cover them.
Example 3: Virginia weekly pay. A worker paid $1,200 a week, $62,400 a year, signed a non-compete. Va. Code § 40.1-28.7:8 · Virginia DOLI
- Average weekly earnings
- $1,200Earnings in the last 52 weeks divided by 52.
- State average weekly wage
- $1,507.01From July 1, 2026.
- Result
- Low-wage employee: voidThe employer may not enter into, enforce or threaten to enforce it; the penalty is $10,000 per violation.
Can you say no to a non-compete, or negotiate it?
Yes, you can refuse or negotiate, but the employer can also decline to hire you. The New York Attorney General puts it plainly: no law requires you to sign a noncompete, but an employer is allowed to ask you to sign one before or after you start work, and a noncompete is a contract whose terms you can try to negotiate. Some states give you time and information first. New York Attorney General
- Notice before you sign. Oregon: written notice at least two weeks before you start. Maine: a copy at least 3 business days before you must sign. DC: in writing 14 days before. Washington: disclosed in writing by the time you accept the offer. New Hampshire: a copy before you accept the offer (since July 28, 2014).ORS 653.295 · 26 M.R.S. § 599-A(4) · D.C. Code § 32-581.03 · RCW 49.62.020 · RSA 275:70
- Something in return. Washington requires independent consideration for a non-compete signed after you start. The New York Attorney General suggests asking what you get for signing: a bonus, training, guaranteed employment, or pay for the restricted period.Washington Attorney General · New York Attorney General
- No retaliation for asking, in DC. DC employers may not retaliate against a worker who refuses a prohibited non-compete or asks about one.D.C. Code § 32-581.03
- Ask before you accept the job. The New York Attorney General suggests asking the employer whether you will have to sign a noncompete before you accept a new job.
- Check the four questions. Which businesses count as competitors, how long it lasts, what area it covers, and what you get in exchange.
- Check your state's row. If your pay is under the floor, or you are paid by the hour, the clause may be void, and in several states the employer should not have asked.
- Ask for narrower terms in writing. A shorter time, a smaller area, a list of named competitors instead of a whole industry, a customer non-solicitation instead of a non-compete, or pay during the restricted period.
- Have it reviewed. A lawyer can review it or negotiate for you; see find a lawyer or legal aid.
“Everyone signs this. It's standard.”
You can say: “I understand. Could you send me a copy now so I can read it before I accept? I'd like to understand which companies count as competitors and for how long.”
“It covers the whole industry for two years.”
You can say: “Would you consider limiting it to the clients I actually work with, or to a shorter period?”
“We need it signed today.”
In Maine, Oregon or DC you can add that the law gives you time before signing: “I want to read it properly first. Can I get back to you within a few days?”
Leaving for a competitor: what to do first
If you have signed a noncompete and are thinking of leaving, the New York Attorney General's advice is to consider whether your new job would violate its terms, and to seek legal advice if you are not sure. New York Attorney General
- Get a copy of what you signed. Ask HR for the agreement and any later amendment. The letter below asks for it and asks whether the employer intends to enforce it, with a 10-day reply date.
- Find your dates. The date you signed decides which version of the law applies in Minnesota, Wyoming, Utah, Oregon, Virginia and others. The date you leave starts the restricted period.
- Take nothing confidential. Return company property and files. Nondisclosure duties usually survive even where the non-compete is void.
- Read the non-solicitation clause separately. Even in Oklahoma, an agreement may stop you from directly soliciting established customers, and Minnesota's ban does not cover non-solicitation.
- Decide what to tell people. We found no rule in the statutes on this page that requires you to tell your old employer where you are going; your agreement may. Some employers send a letter to the new employer, the New York Attorney General notes, so it helps if your new employer has seen the agreement.
What happens if you break a non-compete
An employer can file a lawsuit and ask a court to enforce the noncompete and order you to follow its terms; some send a letter to you or your new employer threatening to sue, the New York Attorney General says. If you get one, a common first step is a calm, short reply that asks for the agreement and says you are getting advice; see cease and desist letters for how these letters work. New York Attorney General
- An injunction: an order to stop. The main remedy is a court order. In Florida, a court enforces a restrictive covenant by temporary and permanent injunctions, a violation of an enforceable covenant is presumed to cause irreparable injury, and no temporary injunction issues unless the employer posts a bond. Under Florida's CHOICE Act, a court must grant a preliminary injunction for a covered agreement.Fla. Stat. §§ 542.335(1)(j), 542.45
- Damages: lost profits. In Louisiana, breaking a valid non-compete may entitle the employer to damages for its loss and lost profits, and a court shall order injunctive relief without proof of irreparable injury.La. R.S. 23:921(H)
- You can sue too, in some states. California lets you seek damages, an injunction and attorney fees from an employer that tries to enforce a void non-compete. Virginia lets a covered worker sue within 2 years and recover lost compensation, damages and fees. Minnesota and Washington allow attorney fees.Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16600.5 · Va. Code § 40.1-28.7:8(D) · Minn. Stat. § 181.988 · Washington Attorney General
- If you are sued. A court case has deadlines to answer. If the employer sues in federal court, see answering a federal lawsuit and a federal summons.New York Attorney General
Letter generator · 2 letter types
Two letters: ask for your agreement, or answer a warning letter
Short, neutral and in writing: no admissions, no threats, a reply date · checked Oct 22, 2026
Each rule comes from the official source linked in the result. It runs on your device: nothing you type is stored or sent. General information, not legal advice.
What to do next
| If… | What to do | Good to know |
|---|---|---|
| You live and work in California, Minnesota (signed on or after July 1, 2023), North Dakota, Oklahoma or Wyoming (signed on or after July 1, 2025) | Treat the non-compete as void, but keep honoring any nondisclosure and, where allowed, customer non-solicitation terms. | California: report it at oag.ca.gov/report. |
| Your pay is under your state's floor, or you are hourly or non-exempt in a state that protects you | Check your state's row; if a former employer threatens you, reply in writing with the rule. | Maine and Virginia fine employers that break these rules. |
| You are offered a job that requires a non-compete | Ask for a copy before you accept, and negotiate time, area and named competitors. | See say no or negotiate. |
| You are leaving for a competitor | Get a copy of your agreement and ask, in writing, whether the employer intends to enforce it. | Use the letter on this page; ask for a reply within 10 days. |
| You received a letter about your non-compete | Reply briefly and neutrally, ask for the agreement, and get advice. | See cease and desist letters. |
| You were served with a lawsuit or a motion for an injunction | Talk to a lawyer right away and note the response date. | See find a lawyer or legal aid. |
For the rest of your rights when a job ends, the Work and wages guide lists every topic and agency.
Getting help
State attorneys general enforce several of these laws and take complaints: New York (1-800-771-7755), California (oag.ca.gov/report), Illinois, and Washington's Antitrust Division. An employment lawyer or legal aid office can read the agreement with you.
Common questions
Are noncompetes now illegal?
Not nationwide. The FTC's 2024 ban never took effect and was removed. They are void in California, Minnesota (signed on or after July 1, 2023), North Dakota, Oklahoma and Wyoming (signed on or after July 1, 2025), void below a pay level or for hourly or non-exempt workers in 11 other states and DC, and from June 30, 2027 void for Washington-based workers.
Did the FTC ban non-competes?
It tried. A federal court stopped the rule on August 20, 2024; on September 5, 2025 the FTC voted 3-1 to drop its appeals and accept the vacatur, and on February 12, 2026 the rule was removed. The FTC now brings cases against particular employers, such as Gateway Services and Rollins.
How does a non-compete agreement work?
You promise not to work for a competitor, or start a competing business, for a set time and area after you leave. If you break it, the employer can ask a court for an injunction and damages. Whether a court will enforce it depends on your state's law and whether the terms are reasonable.
Can you say no to a non-compete?
Yes. No law requires you to sign one, the New York Attorney General says, though an employer may ask before or after you start and may decline to hire you. You can try to negotiate its terms, and in several states the employer must give you notice and time before you sign.
Do I have to tell my employer I am going to a competitor?
We found no such rule in the statutes on this page, but your agreement may require it. Read it first, take nothing confidential, and consider showing the agreement to your new employer, since former employers sometimes send letters to the new one.
How long can a non-compete last?
No more than 12 months in Massachusetts, Oregon and Utah, 365 days in DC, two years in Louisiana and South Dakota. Florida presumes 6 months or less reasonable and over 2 years unreasonable, Washington presumes over 18 months unreasonable, and elsewhere courts decide what is reasonable.
Can I be sued for breaking a non-compete?
Yes. The employer can ask a court for an injunction ordering you to stop the new work, and for damages. Courts first decide whether the agreement is valid under your state's law; if it is void, as in California, you may be able to recover your own fees.
What is a non-solicitation agreement?
A promise not to solicit the employer's customers, or not to recruit its employees, after you leave. It is narrower than a non-compete: Minnesota's ban does not cover it, Oklahoma allows a ban on directly soliciting established customers, and Missouri presumes a one-year employee non-solicit reasonable.
Are non-competes enforceable for hourly workers?
Often not. Nevada bars them for workers paid only by the hour, Massachusetts and Rhode Island for non-exempt workers, Virginia for anyone entitled to overtime, and Oregon allows them only for salaried exempt employees. Pay floors in other states cover most hourly jobs.
What is garden leave?
Pay during the time you are kept out of the market. Oregon lets an employer enforce some otherwise void non-competes only by paying at least 50% of salary for the period, Massachusetts requires employers to pay during the restricted period, and Florida allows covered garden leave agreements of up to 4 years.
Official sources
- FTC: Noncompete Rule page (not in effect; the August 20, 2024 court order; the October 18, 2024 appeal; the September 5, 2025 steps; read October 22, 2026) ftc.gov
- FTC press release, September 5, 2025: Federal Trade Commission Files to Accede to Vacatur of Non-Compete Clause Rule (vote 3-1) ftc.gov
- FTC press release, September 4, 2025: FTC Takes Action to Protect Workers from Noncompete Agreements (Gateway Services) ftc.gov
- FTC: noncompete actions list (Gateway final order November 25, 2025; warning letters September 10, 2025; workshop January 27, 2026; rule removal February 12, 2026; Rollins April 15 and June 22, 2026; Mortgage Connect May 8, 2026) ftc.gov
- FTC Non-Compete Clause Rule, 89 FR 38342 (Federal Register, May 7, 2024): state laws digest, health-care statutes govinfo.gov
- FTC proposed Non-Compete Clause Rule, 88 FR 3482 (Federal Register, January 19, 2023): digest of state laws and the reasonableness test govinfo.gov
- New York Attorney General: Noncompete agreements (read October 22, 2026) ag.ny.gov
- California Attorney General consumer alert on non-competes, no-poach agreements and TRAPs (SB 699 and AB 1076) oag.ca.gov
- Minn. Stat. § 181.988 (2023 c. 53, art. 6, s. 1) revisor.mn.gov
- Minnesota Session Laws 2023, chapter 53, article 6, section 1: effective July 1, 2023, for agreements entered into on or after that date revisor.mn.gov
- N.D. Cent. Code chapter 9-08 (§ 9-08-06), North Dakota Legislative Branch PDF ndlegis.gov
- Oklahoma Statutes Title 15 (§§ 217, 219A, 219B), Oklahoma Senate PDF, December 2019 oksenate.gov
- Wyoming 2025 Enrolled Act No. 87 (SF0107): Wyo. Stat. § 1-23-108, contracts entered into on and after July 1, 2025 wyoleg.gov
- Washington L&I: Non-compete agreements and the 2026 earnings thresholds (RCW 49.62) lni.wa.gov
- Washington Attorney General: Labor and antitrust (RCW 49.62; the 2026 amendments, ban from June 30, 2027) atg.wa.gov
- Oregon BOLI: Noncompetition agreements (ORS 653.295; 2026 minimum $119,541) oregon.gov
- Colorado 2026 PAY CALC Order, 7 CCR 1103-14 (adopted December 8, 2025; effective February 1, 2026): highly compensated $130,014 sos.state.co.us
- Illinois Attorney General, November 14, 2024: enforcing the Illinois Freedom to Work Act ($75,000 per year or less) illinoisattorneygeneral.gov
- 26 M.R.S. § 599-A (Maine Revisor, data extracted October 5, 2026) legislature.maine.gov
- HHS: 2026 poverty guidelines ($15,960 for one person in the 48 contiguous states and DC) aspe.hhs.gov
- Md. Code, Labor and Employment § 3-716 (current text) mgaleg.maryland.gov
- Maryland Department of Labor: Maryland minimum wage ($15 per hour) labor.maryland.gov
- Maryland 2024 Laws, Chapter 378 (HB 1388): health-care and veterinary rules for agreements from July 1, 2025 mgaleg.maryland.gov
- Maryland 2026 Laws, Chapter 301 (HB 1016): licensed architects, effective October 1, 2026 mgaleg.maryland.gov
- 29 U.S.C. § 206: federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour govinfo.gov
- Va. Code § 40.1-28.7:8 (2020, cc. 948, 949; 2025, c. 585; 2026 chapters) law.lis.virginia.gov
- Virginia DOLI, July 1, 2026: new non-compete protections; average weekly wage $1,507.01 doli.virginia.gov
- D.C. Department of Employment Services: 2026 public notice on non-compete clauses ($162,164; $270,274) does.dc.gov
- D.C. Code § 32-581.03: highly compensated employees (365 and 730 calendar days, 14 days) code.dccouncil.gov
- Texas Workforce Commission: Non-competition agreements (Tex. Bus. & Com. Code §§ 15.50, 15.501) twc.texas.gov
- Texas SB 1318 (89th Legislature), enrolled: health-care non-competes, effective September 1, 2025 capitol.texas.gov
- Fla. Stat. § 542.335 (2025): restrictive covenants, presumptions, injunctions flsenate.gov
- Fla. Stat. § 542.43 (2025): CHOICE Act definitions (ch. 2025-213) flsenate.gov
- Fla. Stat. § 542.45 (2025): covered noncompete agreements flsenate.gov
- Florida Senate: 2025 bill page, chapter 2025-213, effective July 1, 2025 flsenate.gov
- La. R.S. 23:921 (Acts 2024, No. 273, eff. January 1, 2025) legis.la.gov
- Utah Code § 34-51-201 (amended by 2026 General Session chapter 341, effective May 6, 2026) le.utah.gov
- Utah Code § 34-51-202 (2026): exceptions (severance agreements, sale of a business) le.utah.gov
- SDCL 53-9-11: competition limitation upon termination sdlegislature.gov
- SDCL 53-9-11.2: practitioners (from July 1, 2023) and community services providers (from July 1, 2026) sdlegislature.gov
- Arkansas Act 921 of 2015 (Ark. Code § 4-75-101), approved April 1, 2015 arkleg.state.ar.us
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 20-14p: physicians (P.A. 16-95; P.A. 23-97) cga.ct.gov
- Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 31-50a, 31-50b: security guards and broadcast employees cga.ct.gov
- Iowa Code § 135Q.2: health care employment agencies legis.iowa.gov
- RSMo § 431.202: employee non-solicitation covenants revisor.mo.gov
- Mont. Code Ann. § 28-2-703 (Montana Code Annotated 2025) leg.mt.gov
Related
This page explains the law in general terms. It is not legal advice about your situation. Justice is not a law firm and is not affiliated with any court or government agency.